Legal Opinion

Odgers v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 29, 1985No. Civ. 78-70543PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

COHN, District Judge.

I

This is a products liability case. Plaintiff Susan Odgers (Odgers) alleges that her use of Ortho-Novum, an oral contraceptive manufactured by defendant Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. (Ortho); caused a blood clot resulting in her partial paralysis. Odgers claims that Ortho’s failure to adequately warn her directly and failure to adequately warn her physician, Dr. Joan Wake (Dr. Wake), of the possibility of blood clotting makes it liable to her for the damages she has suffered.

The case was initially tried in June 1980 on an instruction that Ortho owed Odgers a…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Sondra L. McKenna and James R. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  4. Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Humes v. ClintonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  2. West v. Searle & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Kociemba v. G.D. Searle & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
  4. Edwards v. Basel PharmaceuticalsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  5. Larkin v. Pfizer, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2004

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API