Copple v. Aigeltinger
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Mendocino County vacating a prior judgment and directing a new judgment in plaintiff’s favor. J. Q. White, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an action for the specific performance of an agreement for the sale of real estate. The lower court first made its findings and entered its judgment in favor of defendants. Later, upon motion of plaintiff for amendments to the conclusions of law and for a judgment based thereon in his favor, the court made an order granting such motion, vacating the prior judgment, and directing a new judgment in plaintiff’s favor, which was accordingly entered. From this order the defendants appeal.
The statute expressly provides for an appeal from such an order. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 663a.)
The facts…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. BanghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Harper v. GoldschmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Bird v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Walter G. Reese Co. v. HouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Nason v. LingleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ellis v. MihelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Norman v. MeekerWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Rose v. RundallWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Caras v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Patel v. LiebermenschCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.