Legal Opinion
Stiller v. Arnold
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided June 6, 1996No. 3:94 cv 99 JMPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RODOVICH, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the Motion for Sanctions filed by the defendants, Christine Tomal-Stiller, Annette Tomal, and Daniel Tomal, on March 25, 1996. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED IN PART.
Background
Since 1859, federal courts have lacked jurisdiction over domestic relations matters filed in federal court based upon diversity of citizenship. Barber v. Barber, 21 How. 582, 16 L.Ed. 226 (1859). See also Ankenbrandt v. Richards, 504 U.S. 689, 693, 112 S.Ct. 2206, *702209, 119 L.Ed.2d 468 (1992); Allen v. Allen, 48…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ankenbrandt Ex Rel. L. R. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Barber v. Barber Ex Rel. CronkhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Govas v. ChalmersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Allen v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Melrose v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wagner v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2001
- McKesson Corp. v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Pass & Seymour, Inc. v. Hubbell Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2008
- Sparton Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. v. Jeffrey S. Wax, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.