Govas v. Chalmers
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HARLINGTON WOOD, JR., Senior Circuit Judge.
This ease illustrates the proverbial straw that broke the camel’s back. Judge Williams dismissed the plaintiffs’ claims for discovery violations. Plaintiffs argue that we should reverse Judge Williams because dismissal is too harsh a sanction on these facts. As Judge Williams recognized, the plaintiffs’ conduct was “dilatory and evasive” throughout the course of litigation. December 3, 1990, Memorandum Opinion and Order at 5, 1990 WL 205275. Moreover, Judge Williams forewarned plaintiffs after repeated discovery violations that any further evasive…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- C.K.S. Engineers, Inc. v. White Mountain Gypsum Company, M.S. Riddle and Eryl A. CummingsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Lhlc Corporation v. Cluett, Peabody & Company, Inc., and Deloitte, Haskins & Sells, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Edward A. Sere v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, University of Illinois at Chicago, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Estate of Herbert CammonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Carmelo Melendez v. Illinois Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Crown Life Insurance Company, a Canadian Corporation v. Kerry P. Craig and Craig/associates, Inc., an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Select Creations, Inc. v. Paliafito America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993
- Scott v. McCaughtryDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1992
- Stiller v. ArnoldDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1996
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.