McKesson Corp. v. Islamic Republic of Iran
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FLANNERY, District Judge.
Currently pending before the court is plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Discovery. The motion to compel relates to three specific matters. They are (1) plaintiffs’ request pursuant to Rule 34(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that defendant Iran permit the plaintiffs’ expert witness, Mr. Reilly, and a translator, to visit Pak Dairy in Iran to inspect facilities, equipment, and machinery as may be relevant to the valuation of Pak Dairy in 1982; (2) plaintiffs’ December 24, 1998 deposition notice pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. United States District Court for the Southern District of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1996
- Searock, D/B/A Allied Marine v. Greg Stripling, Counter-Claimant-Appellant, Amf Inc., D/B/A Hatteras Yachts and Aetna Insurance Co., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Resolution Trust Corporation, in Its Capacity as Receiver of First Bankers Trust and Savings Association, F.A. v. Southern Union Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Gross v. LunduskiDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
- System Fuels, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Zearley v. AckermanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v. MiskiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- United States ex rel. Fago v. M & T Mortgage Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.