Legal Opinion

Atic Enterprises, Inc. v. Cottingham & Butler Insurance Services, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided September 20, 2016No. Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-132-DJH-HBBPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

David J. Hale, United States District Judge

Copper is often the target of thieves. Plaintiff Atic Enterprises, Inc. learned this the hard way when thieves stole copper it was transporting. (Docket No. 67, PagelD # 952, 965, 981) Atic’s prior insurance policy covered theft of copper. (D.N. 61-2; D.N. 67, PagelD # 964-65, 975, 985) But when Atic tried to make an insurance claim for the stolen copper, Defendant Cottingham & Butler Insurance Services denied the claim because Atic’s new insurance policy specifically excluded coverage for copper losses due to theft. (D.N.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Nicholas M. Patton v. Richard Bearden, Robert Bearden, and J.M. Bearden, Individually, and D/B/A Bearden Fish FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  4. Hartsel v. KeysCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  5. Mullins v. Commonwealth Life Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API