Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. McCaffrey v. Mahoning County Prosecutor's Office

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 2012No. 2010-1642PublishedCited by 123 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This is a public-records mandamus action in which relator, John McCaffrey, an attorney representing defendants in criminal cases, seeks certain records from respondents, the Mahoning County Prosecutor’s Office and Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney Paul Gains. Because relator has established his entitlement to a few of the requested records, we grant the writ for those few records. For the remaining requested records, however, we deny the writ.

Facts

{¶ 2} In 2006, Mahoning County purchased real property located at 345 Oakhill Avenue in Youngstown. The county decided to purchase this…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. Summit CountyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine v. Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State ex rel. Doner v. ZodyOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State ex rel. Morgan v. City of New LexingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by123 opinions

  1. Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State ex rel. Ohio Republican Party v. FitzGerald (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Deters (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State ex rel. Kesterson v. Kent State Univ.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State ex rel. Lanham v. DeWineOhio Supreme Court · 2013

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API