Town of Midland v. Wayne
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
NEWBY, Justice.
In this condemnation action we decide the existence of a vested right to develop a subdivision and the effect of that vested right on the questions of unity of ownership and damages. We hold that the owners of the undeveloped portions of the subdivision have a vested right to complete the subdivision in accordance with the pre-approved plan. Having a vested right to complete the subdivision means both owners of the remaining undeveloped property, the named defendant and the limited liability company, have interests affected by the condemnation of a portion of the subdivision,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- River Birch Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Godfrey v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Union CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Town of Hillsborough v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ussery v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
- Kirby v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
- Town of Nags Head v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Dep't of Transp. v. Bloomsbury Ests., LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2024
- Dep't of Transp. v. RiddleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.