Legal Opinion

Town of Midland v. Wayne

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 11, 2015No. 458PA13PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWBY, Justice.

In this condemnation action we decide the existence of a vested right to develop a subdivision and the effect of that vested right on the questions of unity of ownership and damages. We hold that the owners of the undeveloped portions of the subdivision have a vested right to complete the subdivision in accordance with the pre-approved plan. Having a vested right to complete the subdivision means both owners of the remaining undeveloped property, the named defendant and the limited liability company, have interests affected by the condemnation of a portion of the subdivision,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. River Birch Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Godfrey v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Union CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Town of Hillsborough v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ussery v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
  2. Kirby v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  3. Town of Nags Head v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  4. Dep't of Transp. v. Bloomsbury Ests., LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2024
  5. Dep't of Transp. v. RiddleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API