Legal Opinion

Town of Hillsborough v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 10, 1969No. 17PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.

The town issued to the male defendant, who then had an option to purchase the land in question, a permit to construct thereon the building which he proposes to construct and to use for a dry cleaning business. Neither such construction nor such use was forbidden by law when the permit was issued. The issuance of the permit did not, of itself, confer upon the defendants a vested property right, of which they could not be deprived by a zoning ordinance subsequently enacted. Warner v. W & O, Inc., 263 N.C. 37, 138 S.E. 2d 782. Such permit, though valid when issued, may be revoked by or pursuant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lee v. . Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. City of Lansing v. DawleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Greene v. Charlotte Chemical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Askew v. LEONARD TIRE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Deer Park Civic Ass'n v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. MLC AUTOMOTIVE, LLC v. Town of Southern PinesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  2. River Birch Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Godfrey v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Union CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Morris Communications Corp. v. City of Bessemer City Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
  5. Application of Campsites Unlimited, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API