Legal Opinion

Dep't of Transp. v. Riddle

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 18, 2017No. COA16-445Published

1Opinion of the Court

DILLON, Judge.

*21 This matter involves a partial taking by Plaintiff, the Department of Transportation ("DOT"), of land owned by Defendants (the "Riddles") as part of DOT's plan to re-route a section of NC Highway 24 in Cumberland County. This appeal is from an interlocutory order in which the trial court determined how much of the Riddles' entire land holdings in the relevant area constitute the "entire tract" for purposes of determining just compensation.

I. Factual Background

In 2002, Joseph Riddle acquired 26 acres of land on the northeast corner of two state roads. The land was bounded on the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Goldston v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Sharpe v. WorlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. North Carolina National Bank v. Virginia Carolina BuildersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Department of Transportation v. RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API