Legal Opinion

Seagram-Distillers Corp. v. Lang

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 20, 1950No. 35,045PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Motion to dismiss an appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court sustaining a demurrer to the complaint upon the ground that the appeal was taken after judgment had been entered.

Defendant’s demurrer to the complaint was sustained. Without notice to plaintiff, the clerk entered judgment for defendant. The judgment adjudged that the court sustained defendant’s demurrer to the complaint. It contained no provision dismissing the action or for costs and disbursements. After judgment had been entered, plaintiff appealed from the order sustaining the demurrer to the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Barrett v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Willoughby v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Lundblad v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. American Button-Hole, Overseaming & Sewing Machine Co. v. GurneeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Harcum v. BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Satter v. TurnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Viiliainen v. American Finnish Workers SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. Seagram-Distillers Corp. v. LangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API