Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Smith

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 1931No. Nos. 28,341, 28,342PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Defendant Cedar Lake Ice & Fuel Company is a Delaware corporation licensed to do ’business in this state. It has its principal office and all of its business 'is transacted in Minneapolis. The other defendants are its directors and managing officers. Plaintiffs are minority stockholders. In this action they charge defendants, particularly defendant Smith as treasurer and general manager and defendant Ellison as president, with mismanagement and conversion of corporate funds. By the decision below plaintiffs were awarded in part for the benefit of the corporation, and denied in part, the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Lessee of CarrollSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Coquard v. National Linseed Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Green v. National Advertising & Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Dorland v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Pust v. HoltzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. In Re Trust Created by Will of EngerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Marriage of Bledsoe v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. In Re Estate of WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Stover v. Central Broadcasting CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1956

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API