Legal Opinion

State v. Camarena

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 2008No. CC 030331454; CA A122282; SC S054330PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, C. J.

This is a criminal case involving the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and its application to statements made by the complainant during a 9-1-1 telephone call. In response to an emergency operator’s return call, the complainant indicated that she had just been assaulted by defendant, her live-in boyfriend. Defendant was found guilty of fourth-degree felony assault at a trial in which the complainant’s recorded statements from the 9-1-1 call were introduced into evidence. Defendant appealed his conviction to the Court of Appeals, arguing, in part,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Sproul v. FossiOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. CamarenaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. S.P.Oregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. PerryOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. HickmanOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. S.P.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. BowmanOregon Supreme Court · 2025

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API