Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. S.P.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 2009No. CC 2004812301; CA A129435; SC S056089PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

This juvenile court delinquency proceeding comes before us on a question of federal constitutional law. In Crawford v. Washington, 541 US 36, 124 S Ct 1354, 158 L Ed 2d 177 (2004), the United States Supreme Court held that the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution forbids the admission of testimonial hearsay in a criminal trial, unless the declarant is unavailable and the defendant has had a prior opportunity to cross-examine.1 See also Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 US_, 129 S Ct 2527, 174 L Ed 3d 314 (2009) (applying Crawford). In this case, we are asked to determine…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. VanornumOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. FranklinTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. ChitwoodOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State v. K.J.B. (In re K.J.B.)Oregon Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. HaugenOregon Supreme Court · 2010

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API