State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. S.P.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
This juvenile court delinquency proceeding comes before us on a question of federal constitutional law. In Crawford v. Washington, 541 US 36, 124 S Ct 1354, 158 L Ed 2d 177 (2004), the United States Supreme Court held that the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution forbids the admission of testimonial hearsay in a criminal trial, unless the declarant is unavailable and the defendant has had a prior opportunity to cross-examine.1 See also Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 US_, 129 S Ct 2527, 174 L Ed 3d 314 (2009) (applying Crawford). In this case, we are asked to determine…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State v. VanornumOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. FranklinTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. ChitwoodOregon Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. K.J.B. (In re K.J.B.)Oregon Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. HaugenOregon Supreme Court · 2010
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.