Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. S.P.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 20, 2008No. 2004812301; 40709062; A129435PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Youth was found to be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court for committing acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427, and first-degree sodomy, ORS 163.405. On appeal, youth argues that the juvenile court improperly admitted into evidence certain hearsay statements made by the three-year-old complainant, N, in violation of OEC 803(4), OEC 803(18a)(b), and the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, as interpreted in Crawford v. Washington, 541 US 36, 124 S Ct 1354, 158 L Ed 2d 177 (2004). As explained below, we conclude…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. PhillipsColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. S.P.Oregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. NorbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Department of Human Services v. J. G.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.