State v. Camarena
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for felony fourth-degree assault. ORS 163.160. 1 He assigns error to the trial court’s admission into evidence of various out-of-court statements by the complainant, including her statements in a recorded conversation with a 9-1-1 operator and her subsequent statements to investigating police officers. Defendant asserts that, because the complainant was unavailable, the admission of those statements violated his confrontation rights under both the Oregon and United States constitutions. Or Const, Art I, § 11; US Const. Amend VI. Applying…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. S.P.Oregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. AyerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- State v. CamarenaOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. PreuittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. BeckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.