Legal Opinion

State v. Perry

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 2009No. CC 03-06-33108; CA A125135; SC S055142PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

Defendant was charged with various crimes based on a child’s report that defendant had sexually abused her. The report was made several months after the crimes allegedly had occurred. At defendant’s trial, the court permitted an expert witness for the state to testify about a phenomenon known as “delayed reporting.” The expert testified that children who have been sexually abused often delay in reporting that abuse. The testimony was intended to rebut an inference that defendant sought to have the jury draw that the child’s failure to report defendant’s alleged acts of abuse immediately…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. SouthardOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. MarringtonOregon Supreme Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. SouthardOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. PittOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. HaugenOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. HenleyOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. BeauvaisOregon Supreme Court · 2015

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API