Legal Opinion
Fullerton v. Administrator
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 26, 2006No. SC 17601PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The principal issue in this consolidated appeal is whether the requirement in § 31-235-6 (a)1 of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies that applicants for unemployment compensation benefits must be available for full-time work is in violation of the requirement in General Statutes § 46a-76 (a) that physical or mental disability shall not be considered as a limiting factor in state administered programs involving the distribution of funds to qualify applicants for benefits authorized by law. The defendant, the administrator of the Unemployment Compensation Act,2…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Petyan v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Robinson v. Unemployment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Finkenstein v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Rayhall v. Akim Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. LawSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- MBNA America Bank, N.A. v. BoataSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Sastrom v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Celentano v. RocqueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Fredette v. Connecticut Air National GuardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.