Legal Opinion
Celentano v. Rocque
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 12, 2007No. SC 17703PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The plaintiffs, Vincent D. Celentano, Cel-Mor Investments, Inc. (Cel-Mor), and Vincent D. Celentano doing business as Cel-Mor Investments, Inc., appeal 2 from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their administrative appeal from the decision of the named defendant, 3 Arthur J. Rocque, Jr., commissioner of environmental protection (commissioner). The plaintiffs contend that the trial court improperly determined that the commissioner properly: (1) had acted within his statutory authority; (2) had declined to impose liability against certain easement holders; and (3) had…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. ArroyoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Goldstar Medical Services, Inc. v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone v. Connecticut Siting CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Curran v. KrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- State v. PetersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.