Legal Opinion

Stowe v. Wooten

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 3, 1931No. 829PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFunderburk, J.

The title to a tract of land adjacent to the city of Abilene was in H. O. Wooten. The land was owned by said Wooten and Mayfield & McGee. Wooten made a contract with R. A. Coquille to sell the land. A plat of the land, showing a division thereof into lots and blocks, with streets and alleys, was filed and designated as the “Country Club addition.” The contract constituted Coquille exclusive agent for the nominal owner, Wooten, to make sale of the lots in accordance with an agreed plan. The plan comprehended that the seventy-four lots were to be divided into thirty-seven units of interest. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chicago, Texas & Mexican Central Railway Co. v. TitteringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Buchanan v. Burnett and WifeTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Wortman v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Tripplehorn v. Ladd-Hannon Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Rick v. FarrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stowe v. WootenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  2. Fulwider v. WoodsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  3. Cassel v. WestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Corrigan v. HeardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  5. Texas Osage Co-Operative Royalty Pool, Inc. v. CruzeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API