Cassel v. West

MARTIN, Justice.

Appellee sued appellant for the balance due on notes and to foreclose his lien, on 160 acres of land given to secure same. Appellant filed a cross-action to cancel a mineral lease on said land theretofore given appellee by appellant, alleging certain fraudulent promises to develop same, and for damages. Such cross-action is all that is properly' involved here.

Judgment was for appellee and against appellant upon his cross-action.

The general nature of the case, as well as' the legal questions involved, are fairly well illustrated • by the following special issues submitted to…