Legal Opinion

Stowe v. Wooten

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1933No. 1392—6000PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEDDY, Judge.

A brief statement of this case will suffice to elucidate the legal question presented for determination.

Plaintiffs in error sought in this, action to set aside deeds of conveyance whereby defendant in error conveyed to them certain lots situated in the Country Club addition to the city of Abilene, and to cancel vendor lien notes representing the purchase money recited in said deeds of conveyance. If was averred that defendant in error had induced the execution of said deeds and notes by certain false and fraudulent representations knowingly and willfully made; some of these…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Carpenter's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  2. Henderson v. RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Jordan v. OsgoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  4. Butler v. WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. Graves v. HaynesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc. v. George P. Mitchell, George P. Mitchell v. Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. Aiello v. Ed Saxe Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Statham v. City of TylerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Fulwider v. WoodsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  5. Meacham v. HalleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API