Legal Opinion
Confer v. Herbert R. Imbt, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 11, 1959No. Appeal, No. 344PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Wright, J.,
This is a workmen’s compensation case. The question before us is whether the compensation authorities were warranted in holding that Fannie Confer, this widow-claimant, qualified as a dependent under Section 307(7) of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of June 1915, P. L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. 562. The referee made an award in her favor, which was affirmed on appeal by the Workmen’s Compensation Board and by the court of common pleas. The employer corporation and its insurance carrier have appealed.
Donald J. Confer was a laborer in the employ of Herbert R. Imbt, Inc. On…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Morris v. Yough Coal & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Creasy v. Phœnix Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Commonwealth v. CooperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Spry v. PoltSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Binkley v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Moore v. Dodge Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Walker v. HEAVEYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Beta Construction Co. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- S & S Associates, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- M.D.S. Laboratories & Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.