Legal Opinion

Morris v. Yough Coal & Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1920No. Appeal, No. 22PublishedCited by 58 opinions

Appeal, No. 22, Oct. T., 1918, by Globe Indemnity Co., from judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., July T., 1917, No. 435, affirming award of Workmen’s Compensation Board in case of Elizabeth Morris v. Yough Coal & Supply Company. Appeal from award of Workmen’s Compensation Act. Before Haymaker, J. The court entered judgment sustaining the award. The Globe Indemnity Co. appealed. Error assigned was the judgment sustaining the award.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

The proceedings under the Compensation Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, are purely statutory, differing from *219the common law, and the appeal to the common pleas is in the nature of a certiorari. For the purpose of review, this court will examine the findings and reasons stated in the adjudication of the referee and the board, as also those on which the opinion of the common pleas is based: McCauley v. Imperial Woolen Company et al., 261 Pa. 312, 322. In this appeal, we have, as a part of the record, not only the findings of the referee, but an analysis of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McCauley v. Imperial Woolen Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Creasy v. Phœnix Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Kurtz v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Bethlehem-Fairfield Shipyard, Inc. v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  4. Icenhour v. Freedom Oil Wks. Co. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Shimkus v. Phila. & Reading C. & I. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API