Legal Opinion

Epp v. Hinton

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 7, 1914No. 18,613PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from Harvey district court; Charles E. Branine, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*514The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

C. C. Epp brought an action against Charles R. Hinton and others, alleging that they had defrauded him by misrepresentations made as an inducement to the purchase of real estate. The plaintiff recovered a judgment for $14,500 and interest, as damages, and the defendants appeal.

The transaction out of which the controversy grows was an exchange of lands, the plaintiff paying boot of $20,000 in secured notes, which passed into other hands. The lands conveyed to the plaintiff were situated in Colorado. The substance of his contention is that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Speed v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  2. Lovejoy v. IsbellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
  3. Osincup v. HenthornSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Stroupe v. HewittSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. Shidy v. CutterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Fox v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. Walker v. Fleming Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  3. Epp v. HintonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. Cramer v. Kansas City Railways Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  5. Becker v. McKinnieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API