Legal Opinion

Niles v. Danforth

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 3, 1923PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

This is an action of contract on a promissory note given by the defendants for a tractor, trailer, and equipment bought by them of the plaintiff. An affidavit of defense Setting up a false warranty, was, by agreement, treated as the defendants’ answer. During the trial, the defendants were allowed to amend their answer by alleging false and fraudulent Representations on the part of the plaintiff, by which they were induced to make the purchase; and thereafter, the defendants relied exclusively on that defense. At the close of the evidence, the plaintiff moved for a verdict on the ground that…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Lehigh Zinc and Iron Company v. BamfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Wooddy v. Benton Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Crompton v. BeedleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
  4. McAllister v. BenjaminSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  5. King v. Livingston Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. LapanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  2. Eastern States Petroleum Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1939
  3. Girard Et Ux. v. Vt. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  4. Land Finance Corp. v. Sherwin Electric Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1929
  5. Campanelli v. VesceraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API