Legal Opinion

State v. Meizo

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 1980No. 48338PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, Justice.

This is an appeal from a criminal conviction for the possession with intent to sell of a controlled substance, contrary to Minn. Stat. §§ 152.01, 152.02, 152.09, and 152.15. The conviction followed a court trial in the Anoka County District Court. At the omnibus hearing held prior to trial, defendant moved to suppress the evidence seized from his home pursuant to a search warrant on the ground that the search warrant was issued without probable cause. The court *127denied the motion to suppress, and on appeal defendant challenges that ruling. We affirm.

The facts are not in dispute.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Commonwealth v. MillikenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. State v. BurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. United States v. Clarence HillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. Glodowski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State, City of Minneapolis v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. State v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. State v. AltCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  4. State v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  5. State v. MohsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API