State v. Meizo
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, Justice.
This is an appeal from a criminal conviction for the possession with intent to sell of a controlled substance, contrary to Minn. Stat. §§ 152.01, 152.02, 152.09, and 152.15. The conviction followed a court trial in the Anoka County District Court. At the omnibus hearing held prior to trial, defendant moved to suppress the evidence seized from his home pursuant to a search warrant on the ground that the search warrant was issued without probable cause. The court *127denied the motion to suppress, and on appeal defendant challenges that ruling. We affirm.
The facts are not in dispute.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Commonwealth v. MillikenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- State v. BurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- United States v. Clarence HillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Glodowski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State, City of Minneapolis v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. AltCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. MohsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.