Legal Opinion
State v. Alt
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 21, 1991No. C3-90-2651PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
The state appeals from a pretrial order suppressing evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant executed at night. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Daryl Alt is charged with first-degree criminal sexual conduct, first-degree assault and attempted murder allegedly committed on the night of August 15-16, 1990. Suspicion focused on Alt, and, after consent to search was denied by Mrs. Gommels, the owner of the house where Alt lived, police applied to the county attorney’s office on the afternoon of August 17 for a search warrant application.
The preparation of the search warrant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State v. LienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. McCloskeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. StephensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. AltCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. AltCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. GoodwinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004