State v. Lindsey
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment of conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. Minn.Stat. §§ 152.09, subd. 1(1), 152.15, subd. 1(2) (1988). Following an adverse ruling on his motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant, appellant Mose Lindsey waived a jury trial and was found guilty on stipulated facts. Upon examination of law governing telephonic application for a warrant, we reverse.
FACTS
Police began surveillance of a St. Paul apartment shared by Carol Middlebrooks and appellant Mose Lindsey in late October 1988. They had received…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. BurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- State v. LienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. McCloskeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Christopher Boyer v. State of Arizona and Frank Eyman, Warden of Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State, City of Minneapolis v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991