State, City of Minneapolis v. Cook
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
Under the facts of this case, the defects in the search warrant obtained by telephone require suppression of the evidence seized in the search. For the reasons stated, we affirm the court of appeals and the trial court.
At about 11 p.m. on Sunday, July 21, 1991, Minneapolis police officers responded to complaints of a noisy, unruly party at defendants’ duplex in south Minneapolis. As Sgt. Michael Fossum approached the residence he could hear music from a block away. As he got closer he observed more than a dozen individuals drinking and shouting from the second floor deck of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. AndriesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. MeizoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. AskeroothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. GailSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. WassonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. RaflikWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.