Legal Opinion

State v. Mohs

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 10, 2008No. A06-199PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Paul H., Justice.

After Jeffrey David Mohs failed to appear for a pretrial hearing and a jury trial, the Anoka County District Court issued a bench warrant for his arrest. While executing this warrant, the police discovered and seized a plastic bag containing methamphetamine. Mohs was subsequently charged with a fifth-degree controlled substance offense. Mohs moved to suppress the evidence seized during his arrest, claiming that the bench warrant violated the federal and state constitutions because it was not based upon probable cause supported by oath or affirmation and did…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. McGrain v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Myon Demarlo Burrell v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API