Legal Opinion
In Re SM
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided April 1, 2003No. 02-214PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
824 A.2d 593 (2003)
2003 VT 41
In re S.M.
No. 02-214.
Supreme Court of Vermont.
April 1, 2003.
Present AMESTOY, C.J., DOOLEY, SKOGLUND and FREDERIC W. ALLEN, C.J., (Ret.) Specially Assigned, and ERNEST W. GIBSON III, J., (Ret.) Specially Assigned.
ENTRY ORDER
¶ 1. Appellants, parents of S.M., appeal from an administrative decision by a hearing officer disallowing S.M.'s enrollment in a home study program on the grounds that appellants failed to comply with 16 V.S.A. § 166b, in particular, that appellants did not provide "independent professional evidence" of the existence or nonexistence of a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rogers v. WatsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Benning v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- State v. BlondinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Brody v. BaraschSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Human Rights Commission v. Benevolent & Protective Order of ElksSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- In Re Rusty Nail Acquisition, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- In Re Appeal of Electronic Industries AllianceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Gregory v. Poulin Auto Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- In re A.V.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.