Legal Opinion

State v. Oliver

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 16, 1989No. 87-512PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C.J.

Defendant was charged with careless and negligent operation of a motor vehicle resulting in the death of a person, 23 V.S.A. § 1091(c). According to supporting affidavits, the accident caused the death of an in útero fetus at a gestational age of 34-35 weeks. The trial court refused to find probable cause for the charge, ruling that an unborn viable fetus is not a person within the meaning of § 1091. The State brings this interlocutory appeal, and the controlling question of law is “whether an unborn viable fetus is a person as contemplated by 23 V.S.A. § 1091(c).” We answer the question in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. GreerIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Vaillancourt v. Medical Center Hospital of Vermont, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  4. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  5. State v. SotoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Thayer v. HerdtSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. Clymer v. WebsterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. State v. GibneySupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  4. State v. LamySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  5. State v. DixonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API