Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Watson
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided May 17, 1991No. 88-391PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
This action began with a complaint by adjoining landowners for an injunction requiring defendants, Gerald and Kay Watson, to remove a mobile home they had placed on part of their land. The complaint alleged that the mobile home violated a restrictive covenant applicable to defendants’ land. It also joined the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources, seeking to require it to enforce certain subdivision regulations that were allegedly violated by the presence of the mobile home. The Agency cross-claimed against defendants to enforce the regulations. The trial court found for the plaintiffs and the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Gardebring v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Bacon v. LascellesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- Conservation Law Foundation v. BurkeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Secretary, Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. IrishSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Benning v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- In re Beliveau NOV, Town of Fairfax v. BeliveauSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.