Legal Opinion
In Re Rusty Nail Acquisition, Inc.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided June 26, 2009No. 08-338PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.
¶ 1. The Rusty Nail, a licensed bar in Stowe, appeals the Liquor Control Board’s conclusion that the bar violated a Board regulation by allowing two intoxicated patrons to loiter on the premises. We affirm.
¶2. In February 2008, a team of liquor control investigators carried out an inspection of all licensees on the Stowe Mountain Road, including the Rusty Nail. After observing licensee’s dance floor from an upstairs balcony for approximately ten minutes, the team determined that one male patron appeared intoxicated. They based this determination on his aggressive dancing, difficulty standing…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Ackerman v. KogutSupreme Court of Vermont · 1951
- Secretary, Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. IrishSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Darrell Allen ShowensSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- In re Beliveau NOV, Town of Fairfax v. BeliveauSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- In re R.H.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- Raymond v. Chittenden County Circumferential HighwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- State v. Green Mountain FutureSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.