Von Buren v. Von Buren
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: The parties were married in March 1974 and have two children. They entered into a written separation agreement on October 30, 1993. The agreement acknowledged the vested interest of defendant in his New York State pension plan as marital property and provided that it be “distributed pursuant to Majauskas and/or Szulgit” (see, Majauskas v Majauskas, 61 NY2d 481; Szulgit v Szulgit, 92 AD2d 712). The agreement was incorporated but not merged in the judgment of divorce…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Rainbow v. SwisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- De Gaust v. De GaustAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Farsace v. FarsaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Keith v. KeithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- McCoy v. FeinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Mumin v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Ross v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Berardi v. BerardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Cowley v. CowleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.