Dutille v. Dutille
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Richard A. Dollinger, J.
In this matter, a couple spar over the question of when a retirement account should be valued for equitable distribution purposes. As with many legal decisions, it depends on how a court interprets an agreement in which the language chosen confuses the exact nature of what was intended.
The facts are undisputed: in May 2009, the couple executed a separation and property settlement agreement (the agreement). The agreement provided that the husband had a pension plan with a current value of approximately $280,000. The *305parties agreed that the wife would…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- McCoy v. FeinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Van Kipnis v. Van KipnisNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- Mesholam v. MesholamNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- Anglin v. AnglinNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.