Legal Opinion

Post v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 2009No. 80684-5PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ.M. Johnson, J.

¶1 The city of Tacoma’s building code enforcement department found many of Paul Post’s properties were in violation of Tacoma’s building codes and assessed hundreds of thousands of dollars in civil penalties. Post cooperated with Tacoma for some repairs but ultimately failed to bring all his properties into compliance. Post also sought to appeal many of the fines, but in most cases Tacoma denied a hearing. Post sued, seeking to bar Tacoma from enforcing its building code against him on numerous grounds, including that his rights to due process *304were violated. The trial court granted summary…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Wenatchee Sportsmen Ass'n v. Chelan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Watch v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Tellevik v. Real Property Known as 31641Washington Supreme Court · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Durland v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Maytown Sand & Gravel, LLC v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  3. RSL-3B-IL, Ltd. v. Symetra Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. In re the Welfare of L.R.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. Durland v. San Juan CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API