Maytown Sand & Gravel, LLC v. Thurston County
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGordon McCLOUD, J.
¶ 1 The Land Use Petition Act (LUPA), chapter 36.70C RCW, bars parties from challenging a local land use decision in state court if the parties fail to exhaust the administrative process. RCW 36.70C.030. The central issue in this case is (1) whether that administrative exhaustion rule applies to all tort claims that arise during the land use decision-making process. The other issues are (2) whether there was sufficient evidence to support the jury's finding of a substantive due process violation under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ( Section 1983 ); (3) whether an aggrieved party can recover prelitigation,…
2Cases cited98 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- STARK VS. LACKEYNevada Supreme Court · 2020
- TAYLOR VS. COLONNevada Supreme Court · 2020
- Thurman v. Cowles Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2025
- Kim Martinez v. Zoominfo Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Rebecca Thorley & Monica Baxter v. Donald E. Nowlin, et uxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.