Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Bon-R Reproductions, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 5, 1962No. 27290_1Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partFriendly, Circuit Judge

I concur in the Court’s disposition save for its setting aside so much of the order as finds Scrima’s discharge to have been an unfair labor practice. In view of my agreement with my brothers’ conclusions *908as to Serima’s conduct, I should be happier if I could conscientiously join in this portion of the decision, too. However, I am forced to conclude that in this respect the majority has gone beyond the power conferred on us by Congress, and that the proper course is to remand this issue to the Board for further consideration in the light of our conclusion that some of the bases on which it…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Nevada Consolidated Copper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Federal Communications Commission v. Allentown Broadcasting Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API