Legal Opinion

Howell v. Kraft

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 26, 1973No. 664-3PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcInturff, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment rescinding a note, mortgage and quitclaim deed executed by plaintiff in favor of defendants, cancelling a debt of $280 allegedly owed defendants by plaintiff, representing advancements to plaintiff from defendants made to cure deficiencies in a real estate contract; and awarding damages in the amount of $8,783.58 to plaintiff. Included in the damage award were $4,854.28 representing the principal balance of the contract reinstated by the court; $475 representing actual damages; $1,000 treble damages under RCW 19.86, the Consumer Protection Act; $132 as fire…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bowman v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Beckendorf v. BeckendorfWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Williams v. JoslinWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Michielli v. U. S. Mortgage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Bimrose v. MatthewsWashington Supreme Court · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of MaddixCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  2. Magna Weld Sales Co., Inc., a Washington Corporation v. Magna Alloys and Research Pty. Limited, an Australian CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. Connelly v. Puget Sound Collections, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  4. Lonsdale v. ChesterfieldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API