Legal Opinion
Magna Weld Sales Co., Inc., a Washington Corporation v. Magna Alloys and Research Pty. Limited, an Australian Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 10, 1977No. 75-1344PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
Magna Alloys and Research Pty. Limited, an Australian corporation [Magna], appeals from a judgment against it in an action charging that it fraudulently persuaded H. F. Soderling and his sons, Karle and Charles, to enter an agreement to set up a distributorship for Magna’s welding materials. Three grounds of appeal are argued: (1) that the trial court’s findings of fact are clearly erroneous, (2) that the trial court failed to find three essential elements of fraud, and (3) that the computation of damages is in error. We affirm the finding of liability, but reverse and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Nat Yanish v. Bruce G. Barber, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Carr v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Limited, of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Veal v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (In Re Veal)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Federal Trade Commission v. H. N. Singer, Inc., and Michael Quinlan and James Earl WeihoffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Gunther v. County of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Federal Trade Commission v. Enforma Natural Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Vance v. American Hawaii Cruises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.