Legal Opinion
Lonsdale v. Chesterfield
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 9, 1978No. 4536-1PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
The threshold question in this appeal is presented by respondents' motion to dismiss for lack of timely filing of the notice of appeal.
It is undisputed that counsel for appellants was misinformed as to the date of filing of the judgment of dismissal. We need not review the circumstances which misled counsel. We are satisfied that the trial judge erred in concluding that he was without jurisdiction to set aside the judgment entered on July 24, 1975. Smith v. Jackson Tool & Die, Inc., 426 F.2d 5 (5th Cir. 1970); Expeditions Unlimited Aquatic Enterprises, Inc. v. Smithsonian Institute, 500 F.2d…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland v. Usaform Hail Pool, Inc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- John Curtis Smith, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Jackson Tool & Die, Inc., Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Expeditions Unlimited Aquatic Enterprises, Inc. v. Smithsonian InstituteCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Cascade Security Bank v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- McDonald Construction Co. v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lonsdale v. ChesterfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Coast Trading Co. v. Parmac, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Lewis v. BoehmCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
- Krefting v. Kaye-Smith Enterprises IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.