Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Fred Meyer, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 21, 2007No. 030100359, A126290PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Plaintiff brought a civil action for false arrest against defendants, and the jury returned a verdict in his favor for compensatory damages. 1 Plaintiff appeals and assigns error to the denial of his pretrial motions to add a claim for punitive damages. Defendant responds that plaintiffs assignment of error is not subject to meaningful review because there is no record of the parties’ arguments regarding the motions. Alternatively, defendant argues that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in denying the motions. We affirm.

We state the facts in the light most favorable to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Holcomb v. SunderlandOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Bolt v. Influence, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. Vance v. TeplickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API