Legal Opinion

Vance v. Teplick

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 30, 2008No. 040909551; A130844PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLINS, J. pro tempore

Plaintiff in this medical malpractice case appeals a judgment after a jury verdict for defendants Stanley B. Teplick, M.D., and Center for Sight-Oregon, PC, on her claims that defendants were negligent and failed to obtain her informed consent for surgeries performed on her eyes. On appeal, she argues that the trial court erred in refusing to give one of her proposed jury instructions, in refusing to require the jury to take all of the exhibits into the jury room during its deliberations, and in denying her motion for a mistrial. We reject plaintiffs second and third…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. King City Realty, Inc. v. Sunpace Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Beall Transport Equipment Co. v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. ex rel. Department of Motor VehiclesOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Ferguson v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. Richardson v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hersey v. LeonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. Vance v. TeplickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API