Legal Opinion
Jackson v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 22, 1987No. 577-86LPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARGOLIS, Judge.
Plaintiff seeks damages for breach of a contract for the sale of real property by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Defendant has moved for dismissal of the complaint for failure of the plaintiff to state a claim upon which relief can be granted or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. Plaintiff has cross-moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability. For the reasons stated herein, the motion of the plaintiff is granted, and the defendant’s motion is denied.
FACTS
On April 26, 1985 HUD advertised, among others, the real property at 134-09…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- D. Joseph Devito, Receiver for Seaview Electric Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- G.M. Shupe, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Neely v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
- Bailey Specialized Buildings, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Miller Elevator Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- American Line Builders, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- Cavalier Clothes, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Hi-Shear Technology Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.