Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Sowell

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided May 20, 2004No. NMCCA 9901777Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CARVER, Senior Judge:

(concurring in part, dissenting in part).

I respectfully dissent as to the majority’s resolution of the assignment of error regarding the military judge’s limitation on the appellant’s unsworn statement. I believe that the military judge abused his discretion and committed prejudicial error. As a result, I would set aside the sentence and authorize a rehearing on sentence. However, I concur with the majority’s denial of the other seven assignments of error. See United States v. Sowell, 59 M.J. 552 (N.M.Ct.Crim.App.2003).

*960A. Unsworn Statement

The appellant contends that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. MamaluyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  2. United States v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  3. United States v. TeeterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  4. United States v. GrillCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  5. United States v. RosatoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API