Legal Opinion
United States v. Teeter
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided July 18, 1983No. 42503; CM 439290PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
COOK, Judge:
Appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer members. Con*69trary to his pleas, he was convicted of premeditated murder, murder while perpetrating the offense of rape, and rape, in violation of Articles 118 and 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 918 and 920, respectively. All of the offenses concerned the rape-murder of Eva Ransom. Though the case was referred as capital, appellant was sentenced to be confined at hard labor for life, to forfeit all pay and allowances, and to be dishonorably discharged from the service. The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- People v. AaronMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. WashingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
- United States v. MatthewsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. HubbardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. RathU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.