Legal Opinion

Hines v. Dean

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 20, 1923No. 107PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

This action was commenced by the defendant in error to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by her, resulting from a collision between a Ford automobile driven by the defendant in error, with a locomotive operated on the S. L. & S. F. Ry. Co’s. line. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the trial court.

The defendant complains of the giving of instruction No. 7, which was as follows:

“The court instructs the jury that if you conclude that the defendant failed to give the signals required by the statute and here-inbefore explained…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Hospital v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BaroniSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Shawnee-Tecumseh Traction Co. v. GriggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. MillikenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  5. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. StantonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. PrinceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Hopkins v. KurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  4. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Sloan v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API