Legal Opinion

International Bank of Coalgate v. Mullen Mullen

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 14, 1911No. 1151PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from District Court, Carter County; Stilwell H. Russell, Judge. Action by the International Bank of Coalgate against Mullen & Mullen and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

This action was begun in the district court for the Southern District of Indian Territory, on November 14; 190G, to recover on three promissory notes, one of which was executed by Mullen & Mullen, J. P. Mullen, J. S. Mullen, L. V. Mullen, and W. C. Rudisill,- on December 4, 1905, in the sum of $2,040, in favor of the International Bank of Coal-gate, with interest at eight per cent, per annum from maturity; the second was executed by Mullen & Mullen, J. P. Mullen, and J. S. Mullen, on December 2, 1905, in the sum of $1,000, in favor 'of W. C. Rudisill, with interest at…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Richardson v. FellnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  2. Commonwealth Nat. Bank of Dallas, Tex. v. BaughmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. St. Louis & S. F. R. v. CundieffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  4. Steele's Lessee v. SpencerSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  5. Erickson v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BaroniSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Cox v. KirkwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Francen v. Oklahoma Star Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Citizens' State Bank of Ramona v. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Scott v. PottsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API